0
  • DE
  • EN
  • FR
  • Base de données et galerie internationale d'ouvrages d'art et du génie civil

Publicité

Simplified methodology for fatigue analysis of reinforced asphalt systems

Auteur(s):


ORCID
Médium: article de revue
Langue(s): anglais
Publié dans: Materials and Structures, , n. 2, v. 57
DOI: 10.1617/s11527-024-02305-1
Abstrait:

Fatigue analysis has an important role in evaluating the durability and performance of asphalt pavements, especially when novel or alternative materials are used. Numerous laboratory studies have investigated fatigue performance with the aim of estimating field behavior as accurately as feasible. Therefore, there are currently many different test methods and data analysis approaches that can be used. One of the most common laboratory test methods is the four-point bending beam (4PBB) test, which results are usually analyzed using the so-called traditional (where 50% reduction in initial stiffness is considered as failure criterion) or the energy ratio (ER) approach. However, outcomes from previous studies have shown that these approaches may not be appropriate and reliable if geogrids are used as a reinforcement. As a possible solution, this study proposes a new simplified flex point (SFP) approach that considers the flex point of the strain amplitude curve, measured during 4PBB fatigue tests, to calculate the number of cycles to failure. These three approaches were applied to four double-layered asphalt sets: one unreinforced and three reinforced with geogrids of different strength (50 x 50, 100 x 100 and 100 x 200 kN/m). The impact of reinforcement on the fatigue life was evaluated by comparing the critical strain values (ε6) of reinforced and unreinforced sets through the fatigue resistance improvement factor. The research findings showed that the use of geogrids improves fatigue life when the SFP and ER approaches are applied and that the traditional approach might not always be appropriate for assessing the fatigue resistance of reinforced asphalt mixtures.

Structurae ne peut pas vous offrir cette publication en texte intégral pour l'instant. Le texte intégral est accessible chez l'éditeur. DOI: 10.1617/s11527-024-02305-1.
  • Informations
    sur cette fiche
  • Reference-ID
    10770124
  • Publié(e) le:
    29.04.2024
  • Modifié(e) le:
    29.04.2024
 
Structurae coopère avec
International Association for Bridge and Structural Engineering (IABSE)
e-mosty Magazine
e-BrIM Magazine